Development Scenarios

Illustrative Scenario: Refillable Body Care

Anonymised scenario 02

Protecting the margin on a refill format

An anonymised OEM brief of a kind that recurs in development work: a refill format whose landed cost and recyclability claim conflict.

The brief: keep the refill story, reduce landed cost by 15 percent and replace a mono-material pump that could not be recycled through local household collections.

One printed sleeve can replace two label variants

18%Landed cost reduced

6Packaging options sampled

1Component reused from the original tooling

The constraint

A lightweight refill pouch looked right on paper, but the minimum order quantity tied up cash and the fill line needed a change part the brand could not justify at launch volume.

What we changed

We kept the existing bottle tooling, moved the refill to a larger-format HDPE bottle with a recyclable cap, and consolidated two label variants into one printed sleeve.

The compliance route

Compatibility and stability testing were repeated on the new pack, the label and claims were re-reviewed, and the PIF was versioned so the retailer had the current artwork and formula together.

Decision	Before	After
Primary pack	300 ml mixed-material bottle	300 ml HDPE, reusable tooling
Refill format	500 ml pouch, 10,000 MOQ	1 L HDPE, 2,000 MOQ
Artwork	Two printed labels	One sleeve, two SKUs

What the scenario shows

The least expensive change is often the one you do not make. A costed comparison of tooling, MOQ, freight and write-offs comes before any recommendation to re-tool.

What this does not imply

The recyclability statement is about the component material and UK collection routes, not a certified environmental claim. No eco-label or certification was issued as part of this project.

Where this sits in a real project

Pack is a cost decision before it is a design decision. Component, tooling, minimum order quantity, freight and write-offs are modelled together under packaging sourcing; the statutory side of that bill is explained in packaging EPR. Why a supplier’s minimum matters more than its unit price is set out in cosmetic MOQs explained, and the whole cost model is broken down in what it really costs to develop a skincare product. Where the formula already exists, the work runs as OEM manufacturing.

Questions we are asked

Why did the lower-cost pouch lose on cost?

Its minimum order tied up cash at launch volume and the fill line needed a change part. A cheaper unit price is not a cheaper project once tooling, working capital and write-offs are included.

Does changing the pack always mean retesting?

Any change to the primary pack in contact with the formula normally means compatibility and stability work is repeated. That is why a pack decision is made before the stability clock starts, not after.

Can an HDPE bottle simply be called recyclable?

Only with care. The statement has to reflect the component material and the collection routes available where the product is sold. We do not issue eco-labels or certified environmental claims.

Similar project

Packaging eating your margin?

We will compare the real costs — MOQ, tooling, freight and write-offs — before recommending a change.

Request a review Back to selected work